Skip to content
thestock.space

Nippon India AMC vs UTI Asset Management: share price, P/E, ROE and financials compared

Prices as of 6 Nov 2026. Figures are from company filings and exchange data. This is an educational comparison, not investment advice.

Nippon Life India Asset Management

NSE: NAM-INDIA · Financial Services

₹1,065.20minus 0.37%

UTI Asset Management Company

NSE: UTIAMC · Financial Services

₹833.05minus 0.19%

Nippon India AMC and UTI Asset Management at a glance

Nippon India AMC and UTI Asset Management are both listed in Financial Services. Nippon India AMC is the larger by market cap, at ₹68,177 Cr against ₹10,708 Cr for UTI Asset Management (6.4 times as large). On valuation, UTI Asset Management has the lower P/E (22.3× against 42.8×) and the lower price-to-book (2.43× against 14.29×). On returns and margins, Nippon India AMC has the higher ROCE (40.0% against 14.2%), the higher ROE (35.3% against 11.0%) and the higher operating margin (67.3% against 44.9%). Over three years, Nippon India AMC has faster 3-year sales growth (+26.1% against +10.8% a year) and faster 3-year profit growth (+28.3% against −2.6% a year). Neither carries much debt for its equity: debt-to-equity is 0.02× for Nippon India AMC and 0.03× for UTI Asset Management.

Key metrics, side by side

Key metrics of Nippon India AMC and UTI Asset Management
MetricNippon India AMCNAM-INDIAUTI Asset ManagementUTIAMC
Price (₹)1,065.20833.05
Market cap (₹ Cr)68,17710,708
P/E42.8×22.3× (the lower figure, shaded)
P/B14.29×2.43× (the lower figure, shaded)
Dividend yield, trailing2.91%4.80% (the higher figure, shaded)
ROE35.3% (the higher figure, shaded)11.0%
ROCE40.0% (the higher figure, shaded)14.2%
Operating margin (OPM)67.3% (the higher figure, shaded)44.9%
Net margin (NPM)49.9% (the higher figure, shaded)28.0%
Sales CAGR 3Y+26.1% (the higher figure, shaded)+10.8%
Profit CAGR 3Y+28.3% (the higher figure, shaded)−2.6%
Debt to equity0.02×0.03×
Interest cover282.7× (the higher figure, shaded)45.4×
Net profit TTM (₹ Cr)1,617480
1Y return+21.3% (the higher figure, shaded)−31.2%
Promoter holding71.72%–

Shaded: the company with the more favourable reading (lower P/E, debt or P/B; higher ROE, ROCE, margins, growth or yield) when the gap is meaningful. n/m means not meaningful, for example ROCE for a bank. Loss-making companies’ multiples are shown but not ranked.

Nippon India AMC vs UTI Asset Management: common questions

Which is bigger, Nippon India AMC or UTI Asset Management?

By market cap, Nippon India AMC is bigger at ₹68,177 Cr, against ₹10,708 Cr for UTI Asset Management (prices as of 6 Nov 2026). Net profit over the last twelve months was ₹1,617 Cr for Nippon India AMC and ₹480 Cr for UTI Asset Management.

Which has a lower P/E ratio, Nippon India AMC or UTI Asset Management?

Nippon India AMC trades at a P/E of 42.8× and UTI Asset Management at 22.3×. UTI Asset Management has the lower P/E. P/E is the share price divided by earnings per share; it varies a lot between industries and with growth, so it says little on its own.

Which has a higher ROE, Nippon India AMC or UTI Asset Management?

Nippon India AMC reports a return on equity of 35.3% and UTI Asset Management 11.0%. Nippon India AMC has the higher ROE. ROE is net profit as a share of shareholders’ equity.

Which is growing faster, Nippon India AMC or UTI Asset Management?

Over the last three years: Sales grew +26.1% a year at Nippon India AMC and +10.8% at UTI Asset Management, so Nippon India AMC grew sales faster; profit grew +28.3% a year at Nippon India AMC and −2.6% at UTI Asset Management, so Nippon India AMC grew profit faster. Past growth doesn’t predict future growth.

Go to the stock pages for Nippon India AMC and UTI Asset Management, or add up to four more companies in the interactive comparison.